Hypertension Journal

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2017 ) > List of Articles


Assessment of End Organ Damage in Hypertension—Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Mohan V Deshpande, Niteen V Deshpande

Citation Information : Deshpande MV, Deshpande NV. Assessment of End Organ Damage in Hypertension—Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Hypertens J 2017; 3 (3):139-146.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10043-0085

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Deshpande MV, Deshpande NV. Assessment of End Organ Damage in Hypertension—Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Hypertens J 2017;3(3):139-146.

  1. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control. A systematic Analysis of Population based Studies from 90 Countries. Circulation 2016 Aug;134:441-450.
  2. Raised blood pressure (SBP> 140 OR DBP> 90) age standardized (%) Global estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2015; [cited 2017 Jul 13]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.2464GLOBALSTANDARD?lang=en.
  3. Heart failure in India: The INDUS (INDia Ukieri Study) study. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2016 Jan-Apr;2(1):28-35.
  4. Factors associated to hypertensive heart disease development: a prospective cohort study in Bayamo, Cuba. Medwave 2016 Jul;16(6):e6492.
  5. End organ damage in hypertension. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010 Dec;107(49):866-873.
  6. Hypertensive heart failure. Indian Heart J 2003 Jun;55:21-26.
  7. Left ventricular hypertrophy as a risk factor: the Framingham experience. J Hypertens (Suppl) 1991 Dec;9(2):S3-S8, discussion S8-S9.
  8. Hypertension as an underlying factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010 Apr;12(4):277-283.
  9. A 4-tiered classification of left ventricular hypertrophy based on left ventricular geometry: the Dallas heart study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 Mar;3(2):164-171.
  10. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension. A rational basis for the electrocardiogram. Am J Hypertens 1993 Feb;6(2):164-169.
  11. Advantages and disadvantages of ECG diagnosis in left ventricular hypertrophy. Vnitr Lek 2002 Dec;48(Suppl 1):103-108.
  12. Hypertensive heart disease. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2005 Apr;7(4):231-238.
  13. Fragmented QRS: a marker of hypertensive heart disease? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017 Sep;19(9):866-867.
  14. Fragmented QRS complexes are a marker of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2016 Oct;44(7):554-560.
  15. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986 Feb;57(6):450-458.
  16. Gender differences and electrocardiogram in left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension 1995 Feb;25(2):242-249.
  17. The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 1991 Jul;266(2):231-236.
  18. Influence of cigarette smoking on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension. G Ital Cardiolo 1999 Jan;29(1):34-38.
  19. Relative wall thickness is an independent predictor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2001 Sep;24(5):493-499.
  20. The septal bulge—an early echocardiographic sign in hypertensive heart disease. J Am Soc Hypertens 2016 Jan;10(1):70-80.
  21. Tricuspid annular motion velocity as a differentiation index of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive heart disease. J Cardiol 2015 Jun;65(6):519-525.
  22. Discrimination of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy on the basis of strain rate imaging by tissue doppler ultrasonography. Circulation 2004 Dec;110(25):3808-3814.
  23. Strain rate imaging differentiates hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy from physiologic cardiac hypertrophy (athlete's heart). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007 Feb;20(2):151-157.
  24. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990 May;322(22):1561-1566.
  25. Why is left ventricular hypertrophy so predictive of morbidity and mortality? Am J Med Sci 1999 Mar;317(3):168-175.
  26. Changes in cardiovascular risk by reduction of left ventricular mass in hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hypertns 2003 Nov;16(11 Pt 1):895-899.
  27. ; Losartan Intervention for End-Point Reduction Study Investigators. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan versus atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for End-Point Reduction (LIFE) Study. Circulation 2003 Aug;108(6):684-690.
  28. ; LIFE Study Group. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study: a randomized trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002 Mar;359(9311):995-1003.
  29. ; LIFE Study Investigators. Regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy during antihypertensive treatment and the prediction of major cardiovascular events. JAMA 2004 Nov;292(19):2343-2349.
  30. Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 2004 Nov;292(19):2350-2356.
  31. High-resolution trans-thoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 Jun;43(11):2083-2090.
  32. Multimodality imaging for left ventricular hypertrophy severity grading: a methodological review. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016 Dec;24(4):257-267.
  33. Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular wall thickness and thickening using 16 multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Radiat Med 2007 Apr;25(3):119-126.
  34. The role of imaging in hypertensive heart disease. Int J Angiol 2014 Jun;23(2):85-92.
  35. Imaging in hypertensive heart disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2011 Feb;9(2):199-209.
  36. Hypertensive heart disease versus hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance discriminators when end-diastolic wall thickness ≥ 15 mm. Eur Radiol 2017 Mar;27(3):1125-1135.
  37. Fibrosis quantification in Hypertensive Heart Disease with LVH and Non-LVH: Findings from T1 mapping and Contrast-free Cardiac Diffusion-weighted imaging. Sci Rep 2017 Apr;7(1):559.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.