Controlling Systolic Blood Pressure below 140 mm Hg in Most Hypertensive Patients matches Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Intensive Treatment: Practical Implications for Patient Care
C Shaun Wagner, Brent M Egan, Jiexiang Li
Citation Information :
Wagner CS, Egan BM, Li J. Controlling Systolic Blood Pressure below 140 mm Hg in Most Hypertensive Patients matches Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Intensive Treatment: Practical Implications for Patient Care. Hypertens J 2017; 3 (1):12-19.
A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-2116.
Systolic blood pressure intervention trial-(SPRINT) and target systolic blood pressure in future hypertension guidelines. Hypertension 2016 Aug;68(2):318-323.
Effects of intensive versus standard clinic-based hypertension management on ambulatory blood pressure: Results from the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) ambulatory blood pressure study. Hypertension 2017 Jan;69(1):42-50.
Unattended blood pressure measurements in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Implications for entry and achieved blood pressure values compared with other trials. Hypertension 2016 May;67(5):808 -812.
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. JAMA 2010 May;303(20):2043-2050.
Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2012: progress toward Healthy People 2020 goals. Circulation 2014 Nov 4;130(19):1692-1699.
Arch Int Med 1997 Nov;157(21):2413-2446.
Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-1252.
Available from: http://www.nejm.org/action/showSupplements?doi=10. 1056%2FNEJMoa1511939&viewType=Popup&viewClass=Suppl).
Standard of medical care in diabetes – 2016. Diabetes Care 2016;39(Suppl 1):S1-S112.
2nd edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;1982.
Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of cardiovascular disease risk factors among non-institutionalized patients with a history of myocardial infarction and stroke. Am J Epidemiol 2006 May 15;163(10):913-920.
[Internet] [cited 2016 March 11] Available from: http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/ weights-and-summary-statistics/.
Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2014 Feb;60(2):127-132.
Comparative assessment of four blood pressure measurement methods in hypertensives. Can J Cardiol Jul-Aug 2011;27(4):455-460.
Eliminating the human factor in office blood pressure measurement. J Clin Hypertens 2014 Feb;16(2):83-86.
Intensive vs. standard blood pressure control and cardiovascular disease outcomes in adults ≥75 years. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016 Jun 28;315:2673-2682.
2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults. Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-520.
Normal distribution. Regents Exam Prep Center. [Internet] [cited 2016 February 29] Available from: http://www.regentsprep.org/regents/math/algtrig/ats2/normallesson.htm.
Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: Principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998 Jun;351(9118):1755-1762.
Treatment of hypertension in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S80-S82.
The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension, I—blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk. Can J Cardiol 2010 May;26(5):241-248.
Epidemiology of hypertension in diabetes. In: Diabetes and Hypertension: Evaluation and Management, McFarlane SI, Bakris GL, (Eds). New York: Humana Press (Springer Science+Business Media); 2012.
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362(17):1575-1585.