Journal on Recent Advances in Pain

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block In-plane Technique: Comparison of Conventional vs Skin Wheal Standoff Technique

Pankaj N Surange, Depinder Kaur, Harshita Surange, Saurabh Anand, Amit Choudhary, Suchitra Malhotra

Citation Information : Surange PN, Kaur D, Surange H, Anand S, Choudhary A, Malhotra S. Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block In-plane Technique: Comparison of Conventional vs Skin Wheal Standoff Technique. J Recent Adv Pain 2017; 3 (1):25-29.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10046-0061

Published Online: 01-06-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction

The foremost advantage of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks is visualization of anatomical structures of interest and then depositing the local anesthetic for block. Supraclavicular block is the very commonly used block for upper limb surgeries.

Aim

The aim of our study is that for greater efficacy and safety of our blocks, we should use a technique in which we are not only visualizing the anatomical structures, but also the complete needle path and ultimately the deposition of local anesthetic in the vicinity of nerves and having a safe distance from adjacent structures like vessels and pleura.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 patients were accepted for study and divided into two groups of 30 each randomly. In group I, ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block was given with skin wheal oblique standoff technique and in group II, the usual technique. Both the groups were compared in terms of better needle visualization, number of attempts, and success of block.

Results

In group I, we were able to visualize the complete path of needle in 70% of cases in first attempt as compared with group II in 40% of cases. In group I, 70% of blocks were placed in the first attempt as compared with 33% in group II. The p-value was <0.005 and difference was statistically significant. Similarly, operator fatigue, time for block placement, and corner pocket visualization were better in group I.

Conclusion

We have an opinion and recommendation from this study that by simple modification of the usual technique of giving supraclavicular block, i.e., raising a skin wheel, we can achieve greater success with our procedure.

How to cite this article

Kaur D, Surange H, Surange PN, Anand S, Choudhary A, Malhotra S. Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block In-plane Technique: Comparison of Conventional vs Skin Wheal Standoff Technique. J Recent Adv Pain 2017;3(1):25-29.


PDF Share
  1. Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):107-115.
  2. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. Anesth Analg 2007 May;104(5):1265-1269.
  3. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology 2006 Feb;104(2):368-373.
  4. Echogenic polymer coating: does it improve needle visualization in sonographically guided biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 May;178(5):1188-1190.
  5. Treated needles: do they facilitate sonographically guided biopsies? J Ultrasound Med 2003 Nov;22(11):1233-1237.
  6. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology 1990 Jan;174(1):43-47.
  7. A concerning direction: in response. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1326-1327.
  8. Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled and polymericcoated needles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000 Mar;11(3):351-358.
  9. Investigation of a new echogenic needle for use with ultrasound peripheral nerve blocks. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007 Aug;35(4):582-586.
  10. Needle tip echogenicity. A study with real time ultrasound. Invest Radiol 1989 Jul;24(7):555-560.
  11. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004 Sep-Oct;29(5):480-488.
  12. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 1. Fundamentals. PM R 2009 Jan;1(1):64-75.
  13. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 2. Clinical applications. PM R 2009 Feb;1(2):162-177.
  14. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part I: understanding the basic principles of ultrasound physics and machine operations. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):412-418.
  15. Speed of onset of “corner pocket supraclavicular” and infraclavicular ultrasound guided brachial plexus block: a randomized observer-blinded comparison. Anaesthesia 2009 Jul;64(7):738-744.
  16. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block. In Hadzic A, editor. Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw Hill; 2007. p. 420-421.
  17. Eight ball, corner pocket: the optimal needle position for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):94-95.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.