International Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Research

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Evaluation of Yen Angle and W Angle with ANB Angle, Wits Appraisal, and Beta Angle for Predicting Sagittal Jaw Dysplasia: A Cephalometric Study

Romina M Kapadia, Shamil D Diyora, Bhumi N Modi

Citation Information : Kapadia RM, Diyora SD, Modi BN. Comparative Evaluation of Yen Angle and W Angle with ANB Angle, Wits Appraisal, and Beta Angle for Predicting Sagittal Jaw Dysplasia: A Cephalometric Study. Int J Clin Dent Res 2017; 1 (1):26-31.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10060-0006

License: CC BY 3.0

Published Online: 00-03-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Sagittal jaw relationship is one of the basic criteria assessed for orthodontic diagnosis. ANB angle, Wits appraisal, and Beta angle are the most commonly used measures. Yen angle and W angle have been recently introduced. It was necessary to assess their predictability by comparing them with routinely used sagittal jaw indicators.

Aim

To assess Yen angle and W angle and compare them with ANB angle, Wits appraisal, and Beta angle in predicting sagittal jaw dysplasia.

Materials and methods

A total of 40 lateral cephalograms of class I malocclusion subjects were selected and traced as per the inclusion criteria. ANB angle, Wits appraisal, Beta angle, Yen angle, and W angle were measured and compared with each other. Statistical analyses used were independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

ANB angle, Wits appraisal, Beta angle, Yen angle, and W angle all show a significant correlation with each other. Yen angle and W angle show best correlation with ANB angle showing 100% sensitivity. The values of specificity and accuracy of Yen angle with ANB angle are 73.7 and 81.48% respectively, and that of W angle with ANB angle are 44.4 and 67.74% respectively.

Conclusion

Yen angle and W angle show a good correlation with each other and with other three measures. Both the angles show highest correlation with ANB angle and the least correlation with Wits appraisal. Yen angle shows stronger correlation with ANB angle than W angle. Yen angle and W angle can be used to assess sagittal jaw dysplasia in addition to the established angles.

How to cite this article

Kapadia RM, Diyora SD, Shah RB, Modi BN. Comparative Evaluation of Yen Angle and W Angle with ANB Angle, Wits Appraisal, and Beta Angle for Predicting Sagittal Jaw Dysplasia: A Cephalometric Study. Int J Clin Dent Res 2017;1(1):26-31.


PDF Share
  1. Classification of malocclusion. Dent Cosmos 1899;41:248-264.
  2. Variation in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948 Oct;34(10):812-840.
  3. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1950 Jul;20(3):168-178.
  4. An analysis of dentofacial relationship. Am J Orthod 1957;43:103-119.
  5. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975 Feb;67(2):125-138.
  6. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991 Feb;99(2):122-128.
  7. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000 Jun;117(6):714-720.
  8. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Jul;126(1):100-105.
  9. Utility of beta angle in assessing the sagittal skeletal discrepancy – a cephalometric study. J Pierre Fauchard Acad (India Sect) 2010;24:152-155.
  10. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle. World J Orthod 2009 Summer;10(2):147-151.
  11. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle. Eur J Orthod 2013 Feb;35(1):66-70.
  12. An evaluation of YEN and W angle in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016;50:26-30.
  13. Predictability of Yen angle & appraisal of various cephalometric parameters in the assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible in Angle's Class II malocclusion. People's J Sci Res 2012;5(1):1-8.
  14. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance. Prog Orthod 2015 Feb 25;16(3):2-10.
  15. Validity of W Angle and YEN Angle in a sample from Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations. J Hard Tissue Biol 2014 Jul;23(3):351-356.
  16. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994 Apr;105(4):328-344.
  17. The G-axis: A Growth Vector for the Mandible. Angle Orthod 2004;74(3):328-331.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.