INTRODUCTION

Although the general principles of treatment of children's facial trauma are similar to those for adults, the technique differs. The experience of most clinicians is limited, as the incidence of facial trauma in children is low. The factors that are responsible for rarity of jaw fractures in children include elasticity of bone and a short thick condylar neck, which tends to resist fracture. However, a high tooth-to-bone ratio encourages fracture through the developing tooth crypts, but it is seldom necessary to remove them.1 For the fracture of the body of the mandible in a pediatric patient, the fracture line extends downward and forward from the upper border of the mandible. Whereas, in adults, the direction of fracture line is usually downward and backward.2 Falls are the most common cause of pediatric maxillofacial injuries; fights and sport injuries are uncommon until the age of adolescence.3,4

CASE REPORT

A 4-year-old patient reported to the department with a history of fall from the first floor of a building while playing. The patient was conscious, and there was no history of convulsion or vomiting. Extraoral examination revealed swelling. Intraorally, there was complete set of deciduous dentition with fracture in left parasymphysis region with dearranged occlusion (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1:

Fracture on left parasymphysis region

ijcdr-1-37-g001.tif
Fig. 2:

Orthopantomogram X-ray showing fracture on left parasymphysis region

ijcdr-1-37-g002.tif
Fig. 3:

Circummandibular wiring done bilaterally

ijcdr-1-37-g003.tif
Fig. 4:

Orthopantomogram X-ray showing circummandibular wiring done bilaterally

ijcdr-1-37-g004.tif
Fig. 5:

Four weeks follow-up

ijcdr-1-37-g005.tif

Circummandibular Wiring

Since the fracture fragments were displaced, they were repositioned and secured with wire. Then an impression was made under short-acting general anesthesia. The splint was made with cold-cure acrylic, and the occlusal coverage of splint was desired to increase its rigidity. The splint was then secured to the mandible with circummandibular wiring. Circummandibular wiring was done by placing a small stab incision on the inferior border of the mandible on the right and left sides 4–5 cm from the midline. A 18-gauze needle was used to enter lingually along the body of the mandible and piercing the lingual mucosa. The 26″ gauze wire was fed and passed onto the buccal sulcus along the body of the mandible. The wire was held together and splint stabilized by winding the wire in clockwise direction (Figs 3 and 4). Intermaxillary fixation was generally not required, and the splint was removed after 4 weeks (Figs 5 and 6).

Fig. 6:

Removal of wire after four weeks

ijcdr-1-37-g006.tif

DISCUSSION

Fractures in pediatric patients are frequently greenstick fractures and require no active treatment.5 The symphysis and parasymphysis displaced fracture are well managed with acrylic splint and circummandibular wiring.6 Displaced angle fracture required transosseous wiring, but these must be kept as close to the lower border of mandible as possible. Then, the patient is placed on maxilla–mandibular fixation for 2–3 weeks.7 Treatment of fracture of condyle is directed toward restoration of normal function as soon as possible after injury. In the initial postinjury period, jaw movement may be limited by pain; this can be relieved by rest and analgesics for first few days, or by a brief period of maxilla–mandibular fixation, followed by an active range of motion exercises.8

CONCLUSION

Continuing improvement in the management and outcome of pediatric facial trauma is dependent on high-quality research. Currently, much of our understanding is based on experience with adults and retrospective studies of children with high dropout rates and relatively short follow-up. Hence, long-term follow-up studies in pediatric patients are required for high success rate.

Conflicts of interest

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None